nuttyguesser.com
  Index :> About Us :> Add Url :> Privacy of Info :> Terms of Service :> Add Article
Search:   
Free 3 way links
 

Fitness & Health

People & Society

News & Media

Automotive

Lifestyle & Fashion

Academics & Education

Research & Science

Property & Estate

Medical Care

Eating & Drinking

Banking & Finance

Jobs & Employment

Home Family & Garden

Tour & Travel

Policies & Law

Outdoor & Sports

Teens & Kids

Recreation & Entertainment

Indoor Games

Business & Services

Malls & Shopping

Self Enhancement

Creative Arts

Internet & Computers


 

  Index –› News & Media –› Spirituality Issues
   
 

The Bible and Homosexuals

   
Author: Ed Howes
 

This subject is certainly worthy of a better study than I have done and obviously, that which has been done by church authorities. I thought I would share some observations I have made, and find useful. It seems clear to me scripture says sodomy between two men and men and animals is abominable behavior. I dont recall any mention of what God might think of a man sodomizing his wife, which could amount to no more than birth control between loving, married, heterosexual partners. However, if children are fruit unto the Lord, then birth control itself is an insult, denying Gods expressed desire and betraying a lack of faith that He will provide large, godly families the necessary support. It would then stand to reason that God would approve birth control for the ungodly, to minimize their numbers.

If we look to the destruction of Sodom, it is not difficult to see sexual assault had become customary for some male residents of the city and was widely known. When a society allows sexual assault to become a lifestyle option for its members, I think it is safe to assume the corruption goes much deeper than we need to know. The story tells us there was not one righteous man in the city. This is correctly, the fear of believers today. We have become many nations of rapidly receding righteousness, producing little good fruit and worthy of destruction. For social comfort alone, we should encourage any fundamentalism that truly increases the proportion of the righteous among us. That is, we want to do no less than balance the sin and we have been falling behind in that battle.

I dont recall any prohibitions against lesbianism in scripture and in the modern West we see that homosexuals often choose family life that effectively argues against any desire to create a new Sodom. Personally, I would prefer loving homosexual parents to abusive, negligent, heterosexual parents, against whom we have too few prohibitions. The scriptural command to train up a child in the way he should go, is transgressed often enough perhaps, to make a top ten transgression list. We do well to keep spiritual matters in some kind of perspective.

Two fundamentalists read a scripture saying a man must not spill his seed on the ground. The literalist fundamentalist says the words on the ground, allows a man to spill his seed anywhere except, on the ground. The principlist fundamentalist will say the scripture forbids a man from spilling his seed anywhere but the intended field.

Both of our fundamentalists have a far more fundamental matter to resolve. If they walk together to turn a corner and witness a man spilling seed, what is the duty of each fundamentalist and the one transgressing the rule? Should the one fundamentalist point out the spillers error or make it public? Bind and castrate him? Does the other stand between the first man and the spiller? Can the spiller apologize for his error and be on his way? What would Jesus do; say something like, go and sin no more? Have you intruded on a man or boy spilling seed? What did you do?

Two men love each other and live together. They are fundamentalist lovers and quite righteous, even though they know scripture warns to avoid the appearance of evil. I sense this is the heart of the issue for most folks. Does another fundamentalist assume they are sodomizing seed spillers or righteous men, keeping their private business private? The choice a fundamentalist, or you or I make in this situation; tells us what we are, not what the lovers are, or are not. Do men not choose sin? Is it my duty to interfere with every man I catch doing so? Is that what Jesus did?

Can it be the focus on the unknown sexual behaviors of our brethren is serving to distract us from weightier matters, such as: Would Jesus kill and die for the political objectives of wicked and foolish men? Jesus said no to Judas, the revolutionary. Are those of us without sin commanded to cast stones or is it a mere option? Do we cast them to discourage sin or satisfy carnal blood lust? On behalf of fundamentalists everywhere, we think you seed spillers and sodomizers should change your ways. We will love you whether you do or not because we love our neighbors.

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Palestinians Cannot Get Citizenship in Another Country
 
The ACLU - Their War Against Christmas and You
 
Heading For a European Constitution (4)
 
Honda Is Top Mainstream Brand For 2006 AutoPacific Brand Satisfaction Awards
 
Upcoming Palestinian Elections Might Put Extremists In Power
 
Military Intelligence: A True Oxymoron if not a Dangerous Blend
 
Civil Rights March in Forsyth County
 
Judaism Purified by the Messiah Will Save the World, said Hashem
 
Prayer -- How to be Confident of Getting What You Asked For
 
The Pride of Us All
 
 
 
Index :> Privacy of Info :> Terms of Service  
© 2006 www.nuttyguesser.com - All Rights Reserved